I mentioned in my last post that I have tweaked the way I do evangelism by adding in an element of confrontation. When someone tells me they grew up in church or some other spiritually-related fact of their life, I take that as an opened door to talk with them about their faith. On two levels: 1) They have broached the subject; 2) Their claim to go to have grown up in church lets me know that they have been exposed to biblical teaching. Therefore, I follow the path that they have blazed. I ask them why they stopped going to church, if they were ‘confirmed’ (as I am in the context of a large Roman Catholic population), etc. The best question I tend to ask is what they think about Jesus. You will get a slew of responses, all of which will tell you something of someone’s heart.
      In our evangelism, this is where we must go. The resurrection, the existence of God, Creation|Evolution…all must lead to the person having a clear understanding of who Jesus is. This will, of course, be butressed with solid apologetics, but they must all lead to the person affirming or denying Christ.
For the sake of being irenic, so many Christians will receive blunt confrontation, but will not use the force of the person’s argument. For instance, when someone charges the Christian with being closed-minded we should not balk at asking the accuser a series of questions that indicts them for being closed-minded. They have just judged my worldview as being ridiculous, why should I not help them see its consistencies through love as well as lovingly show them the ridiculous nature of their argument? We do the non-believer a disservice if we just smile and do not tell them that what they are holding in their hand is merely a piece of wood – deaf, dumb, and mute. This is the epitome of love – to show someone their error and help them see truth.
     We cannot settle for catchy slogans in this line of evangelism – “God said, I beleive it, that settles it;” “You think you’re perfect, try walking on water;” and so on. The rebuttals people have are not merely syllogisms. They are charged with emotional electricity. I cannot tell you how many people have written off Christianity because of a certain youth pastor that did something or said something mean to them or a friend. I cannot tell you how many people have rejected a false Christianity – legalism or license. We must enter into these discussions saturated by the fact that before the Holy Spirit opened our eyes, we were doing the same thnigs. I have done myself a service by closing my eyes and remembering when I was a non-believer. I try to remember the music I listened to, what I was thinking as I meditated on the lyrics, how I felt about someone, what I longed for…Anything that will remind me what I was like before Christ. This must keep us humble…and it will affect our tone when we lovingly and forcefully show that this person has an idol in his hand.

Previous ArticleNext Article

This post has 2 Comments

  1. I was also “confirmed” while growing up as a Sola Scriptura-believing Lutheran. :) Of course, it’s taken about as seriously among most Lutherans as it is among Catholics, with Confirmation being viewed as the end of your required involvement in Sunday school and church stuff, rather than the beginning of choosing to walk with God for yourself instead of your parents doing things like making sure you pray, read the Bible, and go to church.

    I like your ideas though. I regret not being more bold in bringing up faith in conversations in the past, which is nothing more than being self-conscious and afraid of confrontation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

God’s Broad Shoulders

One of the fascinating aspects of my profession is that I come in contact with a lot of Christians who want to engage with their faith in a deep way. Rather than being content with showing up on Sunday or being CINO (Christian In Name Only), these folks want to understand the Bible better and tease out the implications for their lives.

On the flipside of this, many of these same people are afraid to engage with their doubts in a deep way. It’s almost as if, doubts and questions are treated from a distance–“I don’t struggle with this, but…”

The biggest breakthrough in my own journey of faith came through (and continues to come through) engaging my doubts and questions as my own. They are not theoretical. They are honest struggles: problem of evil is the perennial one. I was in the throes of one of these bouts several years ago when a friend told me, “God can handle your doubts.”

I have used this same bit of advice for my struggling friends and self. If truth is not relative. If God is truth. Your doubts and questions will not overthrow this objective, transcendent truth. It’s not as though you are the first to struggle with doubts and fears and pain. The heavens will not collapse under the weight of your doubts. You won’t come up with a question that will cause God to close up shop. You can honestly engage with your doubts and fears and pain and suffering without having to be quick to give the typical and trite answers to matters of faith.

Go ahead, roll your burdens on God. He’s got broad shoulders.

Blow the Roof Off

Reading through Os Guiness’ new book, Fool’s Talk, for an Honors Seminar I’m leading on the art of persuasion. It is EXCELLENT.

I find that too many apologists take the defensive in explaining the Christian worldview. That has a place, but I would recommend that after you listen and listen and listen some more to the person you are engaging in dialogue, that you take the offensive. Of course, this is not being offensive, but taking the offense in showing the foolishness of the worldview. At some point the team has to score. If they only have defense, they will not score (okay, for the nay-sayers, the defense can score on a take-away…but even then there was an aggression to get the ball and not merely to prevent…BTW, prevent defense is such a great way to lose a ballgame, isn’t it?).

Here’s a juicy quote that I have underlined in the book:

From Jesus onward, the dynamic is crystal clear in Christian proclamation. “The tree is known by its fruit,” Jesus said–not by its seed (Mt. 12.33). If you had tried to persuade the prodigal son to return home the day he left home, would he have listened? If you had spoken to him the day he hit the pigsty, would you have needed to persuade him? Always “see where it leads to,” St. Augustine advised when dealing with false ideas. Follow it out to the “absolutely ruddy end,” C. S. Lewis remarked with characteristic Englishness. “Push them to the logic of their presuppositions,” Francis Schaeffer used to say. Too many varieties of unbelief are halfway houses. Too many unbelievers have not had the courage or the consistency to follow their thoughts all the way home –Fool’s Talk, p.118 (emphasis added)

Modern-day Power Encounters

I remember reading in my Perspectives Class on world mission a phenomenon called “power encounters” whereby a missionary would directly confront the idols of the day in some bombastic way to show the futility of such idols. For example, tearing down a totem pole or cutting down a tree (if these were the items of worship) in an area. While the confrontationalist in me loves the idea, I wonder how much was missed in these opportunities to really get to the heart of idolatry–namely, through teaching that idols are nothing (1Cor 8.4). Yet for those who worship an idol, it is very much a real thing.

I am currently reading Roland Allen’s formative text on mission, Missionary Methods: St. Paul’s or Ours, and have been immensely helped (in tandem with Lesslie Newbigin’s The Open Secret). Regarding the moral and social condition in which Paul preached, Allen makes this side comment:

Incidentally I should like to remark that in heathen lands it might still perhaps be the wiser course to preach constantly the supremacy of Christ over all things spiritual and material, than to deny or deride the very notion of these spirits. Some of our missionaries know, and it were well for others if they did know, that it is much easier to make a man hide from us his belief in devils than it is to eradicate the belief from his heart. By denying their existence or by scoffing at those who believe in them we do not help our converts to overcome them, but only to conceal their fears from us. By preaching the supremacy of Christ we give them a real antidote, we take them a real Saviour who helps them in their dark hours” (pp.28-29)

Allen brings balance. Too often preachers can assume they are preaching the supremacy of Christ, but they never pinpoint what exactly he is supreme over. Put another way, we preachers can preach rather generically. “Jesus is Lord over all!” We declare full throttle. Yet those listening have not been helped.

What is he supreme over?

He is supreme over your doubts of salvation. Your incessant anger. Your slavery to lust and pornography. Your boring and romantic-less marriage. Your bad parenting. Your disobedient children. Your greed. Your self-doubt. Your self-aggrandizement. Your obedient children. Your good parenting. Your healthy marriage. Your pure eyes. Your self-control.

He owns you. Therefore, the world doesn’t revolve around you anymore. Instead, he sets you free to think of others. Even more, he empowers you by his Spirit to think of other more highly than yourself. Your fears that you will be passed over for the job promotion. Your self-righteousness toward your unbelieving neighbor is set under his lordship in such a way that you no longer possess the answers, but are possessed by One who does. You cannot gloat that you understand the world en esse. Rather, you are saddened by the way the world actually is.

So, Christian, we need a modern-day power encounter. Not where we smash totems. But by understanding the world around us and helping others see our need for a Savior. We limp forward together. We bind up wounds together. We use the splint our arm is wrapped in to bind our neighbors’ arms. Thereby we see that instead of hiding the idol in shame, our neighbor is free to admit the idol and know that he will not be condemned but helped.